| Portfolios 
        boost quantum computingBy 
      Eric Smalley, 
      Technology Research News
 Financial advisers commonly tell investors 
        to diversify their portfolios in order to minimize risk. This concept 
        is also true in computing.
 
 Just as multiple investments allow investors to better balance financial 
        risk and reward, a mix of algorithms will work better than any single 
        algorithm to solve computer problems that take varying amounts of time 
        for each attempt. In computing, the potential risk is that any given attempt 
        will require a lot of time, while the potential reward is a quick solution.
 
 Researchers who previously proved this point for classical computing have 
        shown that the portfolio strategy will also improve the performance of 
        quantum computers.
 
 In both classical and quantum computing, the advantage of using the portfolio 
        strategy boils down to having a range of tools available in the face of 
        the unknown.
 
 In classical computing, these types of problems include scheduling and 
        route-planning problems that require each possibility to be examined one 
        at a time, and Web searches and robot navigation that exist in variable 
        environments like the Internet or the physical world. "For an algorithm 
        or program that has a certain probability of executing in a given time, 
        many trials of that algorithm will [vary] in their finishing times," said 
        Bernardo Huberman, a scientist at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories.
 
 In their previous work, the researchers identified that variance for these 
        hard combinatorial classical computer problems, and were able to construct 
        a mixture of algorithms that decreased the variability and also increased 
        performance.
 
 Quantum algorithms by their nature are probabilistic, varying in unknown 
        ways on different problems, said Huberman. According to the researchers' 
        calculations, the gain in efficiency in using portfolios of quantum algorithms 
        is equivalent to the gain in using portfolios of classical algorithms.
 
 In quantum computing, the length of time a program runs is set beforehand 
        and the question is whether it will succeed. The variability is in the 
        likelihood of success. Using portfolios of algorithms will improve those 
        chances of success.
 
 In addition, it might be possible to use the weirdness of quantum mechanics 
        to further increase the efficiency by combining contributions from multiple 
        algorithms, said Huberman.
 
 Quantum computing can in theory use the interactions of atoms and subatomic 
        particles to solve certain problems like cracking secret codes and searching 
        large databases much faster than the fastest classical computer possible.
 
 Quantum particles like atoms and electrons can spin in one of two directions, 
        up or down. These two directions can represent the ones and zeros of digital 
        information. When a subatomic particle or atom is undisturbed it enters 
        into the weird quantum mechanical state of superposition, meaning it is 
        in some unknown mixture of all possible states. In superposition, the 
        particles spin in some mixture of up and down at the same time.
 
 In these unknown superpositions, particles have certain probabilities 
        of being in any one state. Quantum algorithms run a certain number of 
        operations based on these probabilities. After the algorithm goes through 
        the given number of operations, the results are examined, which destroys 
        the superposition. If the computer did not find the answer during these 
        operations, the problem must be run all over again.
 
 Quantum portfolios would allow the researchers to find the algorithm with 
        the best chance of finding the answer for a given problem and number of 
        operations.
 
 Taking advantage of quantum portfolios will require practical quantum 
        computers, which are probably decades away. "Twenty years sounds like 
        a safe bet," said Huberman.
 
 Huberman's research colleagues were Sebastian M. Maurer of Stanford University 
        and Tad Hogg of HP Labs. They published their research in the December 
        17, 2001 issue of the journal Physical Review Letters. The research was 
        funded by the Fannie and John Hertz Foundation and Hewlett-Packard Company.
 
 Timeline:   20 years
 Funding:   Private, Corporate
 TRN Categories:   Quantum Computing
 Story Type:   News
 Related Elements:  Technical paper, "Quantum portfolios," 
        Physical Review Letters, December 17, 2001
 
 
 
 
 Advertisements:
 
 
 
 | February 
      6, 2002
 
 Page 
      One
 
 Tiny chain revs microdevices
 
 Labs-on-a-chip gain 
      micro mixer
 
 Starting over speeds 
      searches
 
 Nudged nested 
      nanotubes may oscillate
 
 Portfolios boost 
      quantum computing
 
 News:
 Research News Roundup
 Research Watch blog
 
 Features:
 View from the High Ground Q&A
 How It Works
 
 RSS Feeds:
 News
  | Blog  | Books  
 
   
 Ad links:
 Buy an ad link
 
 
 
         
          | Advertisements: 
 
 
 
 |   
          |  
 
 
 |  |  |